2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are we correctly assessing scapholunate injuries under arthroscopy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a cohort of around 100 patients considered to be at EWAS stage 3 or 4, almost 72% of patients had radiographically visible instability. 5 These findings do not respect the linearity established by the two previous classifications. In addition, certain situations are not included in the Garcia-Elias et al algorithm, such as the management of radiologically visible deformities without osteoarthritis or pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a cohort of around 100 patients considered to be at EWAS stage 3 or 4, almost 72% of patients had radiographically visible instability. 5 These findings do not respect the linearity established by the two previous classifications. In addition, certain situations are not included in the Garcia-Elias et al algorithm, such as the management of radiologically visible deformities without osteoarthritis or pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Because radiological angles may be altered in so-called predynamic cases, it seems difficult to attribute a linearity of therapeutic strategy. 5 Further studies on the evolution of scapholunate instability need to be undertaken to better understand it. The wrist surgeon will have to take all these elements into account, to take his vision away from the microscope (the lesion) and look further through a telescope (the whole situation).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%