Are we all transnationals now? Network transnationalism and transnational subjectivity: the differing impacts of globalization on the inhabitants of a small Swiss city

Abstract

I ask in this article how the inhabitants Á migrants and non-migrants Á of a specific geographical space, a small Swiss city in French-speaking Switzerland, live out different forms of transnationalism. Transnationalism is for this purpose defined and operationalized on two dimensions: I make a distinction between network transnationalism and what I call transnational subjectivity. The first dimension includes the transnational social networks; the latter refers to the cognitive classifications of a person's membership and belongings in transnational space. Analysis of the personal social networks of 250 inhabitants of this city, supplemented by data from qualitative interviews, brings to light four different ideal types of how transnationalism is lived. It reveals that these morphologies are closely related to questions of social positioning as well as processes of integration, locally or in transnational space.

Diaspora and Transnationalism : Concepts, Theories and Methods

“…For example, in the current debate over how processes of migrant incorporation in the host country and the establishment of transnational spaces are related, transnationality is often seen either as an alternative to integration or as the condition of being 'integrated' in the host country and the country of origin at the same time (e.g. Dahinden 2009;Waldinger & Fitzgerald 2004). The typology reveals that we are in fact not dealing here with a zero-sum game: the best-anchored social actors in our analysis -for instance, 'diasporic' Armenians -provide evidence of a high transnational engagement even while they are themselves not particularly mobile at all.…”

›Inclusion‹ and ›Exclusion‹: Transnational Experiences of Turkish and Kurdish Youth in London

“…These cities are localized because they receive a large number of migrants from all over the world, and migrant communities construct their urban spaces in specific locations they have settled in. As a result of this diversity, transnationally connected and socio-economically differentiated local places can be found in global cities (Dahinden 2009). According to Parkin (1999), the significant migrant populations in the big cities of Europe is an important characteristic feature of these cities, as these migrant communities have their own political agendas which are not necessarily compatible with British, German or French identities.…”

“…Cosmopolitan cities like London, New York, and Berlin offer a diversity of cultures, containing localized spaces whilst being at the same time global (Cattacin 2006;Dahinden 2009;Parkin 1999;Smith 2001). These cities are localized because they receive a large number of migrants from all over the world, and migrant communities construct their urban spaces in specific locations they have settled in.…”

Non-Territorial Spaces of Belarusian Political Nomadism

“…Although in Belarus laws contain democratic provisions, presidential decrees have repeatedly overpowered and undermined them. 4 The presidential institution has concentrated and centralised governmental and military power and views NGOs as political agents 5 .…”