2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03812.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are vascular epiphytes nitrogen or phosphorus limited? A study of plant 15N fractionation and foliar N : P stoichiometry with the tank bromeliad Vriesea sanguinolenta

Abstract: Summary• Although there is unambiguous evidence for vascular epiphytic plants to be limited by insufficient water and nutrient supply under natural conditions, it is an open debate whether they are primarily phosphorus (P) or nitrogen (N) limited.• Plant 15 N fractionation and foliar N : P stoichiometry of a tank epiphyte (Vriesea sanguinolenta), and its response to combined N-P fertilization, were studied under semi-natural conditions over 334 d to clarify the type of nutrient limitation.• Plants collected in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nitrate and ammonium supply rates in soil did not correlate strongly with either standing biomass or growth rates of fine roots, signifying that inorganic N may only be secondarily limiting or that acquisition of N via mycorrhizal associations may be more important. Second, foliar d 15 N was negatively related to N:P ratio, consistent with other studies of P-limited systems (McKee et al 2002;Clarkson et al 2005;Wanek and Zotz 2011). Although trees may store excess P in leaves, foliar N:P ratios are considered an indicator of the relative limitation of plant growth by N versus P (Güsewell 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Nitrate and ammonium supply rates in soil did not correlate strongly with either standing biomass or growth rates of fine roots, signifying that inorganic N may only be secondarily limiting or that acquisition of N via mycorrhizal associations may be more important. Second, foliar d 15 N was negatively related to N:P ratio, consistent with other studies of P-limited systems (McKee et al 2002;Clarkson et al 2005;Wanek and Zotz 2011). Although trees may store excess P in leaves, foliar N:P ratios are considered an indicator of the relative limitation of plant growth by N versus P (Güsewell 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Compared with the forest floor, suspended soils associated with epiphytes are nitrogen poor [53], and are likely to depend upon inorganic nitrogen from the atmosphere [54]. It is possible that the fern soil microorganisms at the Eden Project were not nitrogen limited, which would explain the lack of a response to the addition of nitrogen consistent with observations of other tropical soils [55].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In response to the increase in foliar [P], foliar N/P ratios decreased in the three eudicot species. These declines in foliar N/P ratios caused the typical tropical tree N/P ratios (c. 30) to decline towards those found in high-latitude, putatively N- (Garrish et al 2010) or when a switch from P limitation to N limitation occurs (Wanek & Zotz 2011). The lack of foliar P accumulation by the O. mapora palm suggests that this species is (i) incapable of luxury consumption; (ii) is uniquely capable of down regulating P uptake; or (iii) that increased P uptake was allocated to greater production or stored elsewhere in the palm.…”
Section: F O L I a R N P A N D N / Pmentioning
confidence: 98%