1987
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4076(87)90044-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are user fees regressive?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theoretical framework is based on discrete choice models following the examples of [23, 24]. Discrete choice models are derived from the hypothesis that the choice of the individual follows a maximisation behaviour of the random utility [25, 26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The theoretical framework is based on discrete choice models following the examples of [23, 24]. Discrete choice models are derived from the hypothesis that the choice of the individual follows a maximisation behaviour of the random utility [25, 26].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4). Gertler et al [23] develop a random utility model in which the demand for medical care is modeled as the decision to seek care and, conditional on that, the decision of which provider to use. The corresponding econometric specification is the nested multinomial logit model, which relaxes the independence of non relevant alternatives (IIA) assumption [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits minus the costs provide a latent utility for each alternative and each individual. Hence, the observed alternative (the selected healthcare provider) is the one that has the highest expected latent utility for that specific individual [34,35]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For equity, because health care has been argued to be an essential good, the demand for it will not fall with price (ie, price inelasticity), and people in the lowest income quintile have shown to be highly responsive to even small changes in price. 13 Hence, even very small fees can reduce their access, and exemption mechanisms for these groups have repeatedly failed. 9 Médecins Sans Frontières studied prices paid in several subSaharan African countries at public-health centres that applied user fees for primary care, [14][15][16] and found that the fees represented a substantial share of household expenditure (equivalent to 12-30 days of expenses), forcing many families to borrow money or sell goods.…”
Section: Field Hospital In Burkina Fasomentioning
confidence: 99%