2001
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.71.2.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are two heads better than one?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the accuracy of individual tests, or combinations of tests, 22 and the circumstances in which they could replace angiography are still debated. 23 A recent 'paper exercise' to assess what results of which less invasive tests would be accepted by clinicians in making the decision of whether or not to proceed to endarterectomy indicated little confidence in using single, less invasive tests except where there was a severe symptomatic stenosis.…”
Section: What Is Wrong With Angiography?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the accuracy of individual tests, or combinations of tests, 22 and the circumstances in which they could replace angiography are still debated. 23 A recent 'paper exercise' to assess what results of which less invasive tests would be accepted by clinicians in making the decision of whether or not to proceed to endarterectomy indicated little confidence in using single, less invasive tests except where there was a severe symptomatic stenosis.…”
Section: What Is Wrong With Angiography?mentioning
confidence: 99%