2017
DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2017.1413418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are traditional and modern forestry institutions complementary or do they prescribe contradictory rights in Trans-Himalayan Nepal? A lesson to be learned for REDD+ implementation

Abstract: for their cooperation and comments. I am grateful to the staff of the Department of Geography for providing administrative as well as technical support during my PhD tenure. Special thanks go to Anne-Kathrin Thomassen, Marianne Soltveit and Gro Aase for their support in dealing with the practicalities of the department. I extend thanks to all of the academic staff and to my colleagues at the Department, especially Yograj Gautam, Madan K. Suwal and Kuber P. Bhatta for their cooperation and company, and for shar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 140 publications
(278 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the reciprocal relation of structure and action through practice within institution, as explained by Anthony Giddens, helps to analyse society more closely than relying on Berger & Luckmann only. However, since human interact with and rely on natural resources for various reasons (e.g., sustaining livelihood) (see Poudel, 2018;2019) institutions for natural resource management conflate peoplenature relation with social institutions and mediate their relationships (Leach et al, 1999;Gupta et al, 2010;Young, 2010), so all humanly used resources are embedded in complex social-ecological systems (Ostrom, 2009). The following section deals with these aspects of the institution.…”
Section: Institution As Embedded Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, the reciprocal relation of structure and action through practice within institution, as explained by Anthony Giddens, helps to analyse society more closely than relying on Berger & Luckmann only. However, since human interact with and rely on natural resources for various reasons (e.g., sustaining livelihood) (see Poudel, 2018;2019) institutions for natural resource management conflate peoplenature relation with social institutions and mediate their relationships (Leach et al, 1999;Gupta et al, 2010;Young, 2010), so all humanly used resources are embedded in complex social-ecological systems (Ostrom, 2009). The following section deals with these aspects of the institution.…”
Section: Institution As Embedded Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%