Engineering Geology for Society and Territory - Volume 2 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09057-3_79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Torrent Check-Dams Potential Debris-Flow Sources?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, sediment deposits upstream of hydraulic barriers may represent an important sediment source in the case of sediment flushing. This may cause artificial debris flow, as observed, e.g., at Slovenian mountain rivers (Sodnik et al, 2015). According to the present study, such intense sediment transport may occur when hydraulic barriers transform typically supply-limited channels into channels with locally unlimited sediment supply (Recking, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, sediment deposits upstream of hydraulic barriers may represent an important sediment source in the case of sediment flushing. This may cause artificial debris flow, as observed, e.g., at Slovenian mountain rivers (Sodnik et al, 2015). According to the present study, such intense sediment transport may occur when hydraulic barriers transform typically supply-limited channels into channels with locally unlimited sediment supply (Recking, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The geometry of the deposition area referred to the desirable optimum between sediment retention and flushing: the trapping efficiency of reservoirs (Brown, 1943), as well as the sediment flushing potential, which increases with increasing length and decreasing width of the deposition area (Zollinger, 1983(Zollinger, , 1984Piton and Recking, 2016a). The unwanted flushing of sediment traps represents a high risk at urban downstream reaches and should be avoided (Morris et al, 2008;Sodnik et al, 2015). To ensure a high trapping efficiency, but at the same time limit the risk of unwanted sediment flushing, a rectangular deposition area with a width to length ratio of 3 : 4 was used for the experiments (Zollinger, 1983).…”
Section: Premises and Descriptions Of The Deposition Area With Guidinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sediment supply of mountain rivers is a substantial source for the dynamics of river ecosystems. Artificial barriers, such as dams, can affect the natural flow regime vari-ability with direct impacts on the eco-morphological state of rivers (Allan and Castillo, 2007;Sponseller et al, 2013). Maintaining the natural conditions of rivers is a multidisciplinary concern and artificial interventions require the consideration of ecological and morphological site evaluations (Bain et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To intercept these hazardous phenomena, structural countermeasures are commonly installed along the predicted flow paths to dissipate the kinetic energy and retain the debris volume (Baldwin et al 1987;Hübl et al 2005;Cui et al 2018). Closed-type dam, a retention structure, is typically used to store torrent sediments and to diminish energy (Jaeggi et al 1997;Sodnik et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%