1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90024-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are time-averaged restraints necessary for nuclear magnetic resonance refinement?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
3
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
91
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When restrained molecular dynamics refinement is performed on a bound ligand in the absence of the receptor, the danger exists that regions of the ligand that are poorly restrained by NOES will adopt conformations that are influenced by the force field of the free ligand. Refinement methods that beter represent the limitations of the NOE restraints, such as MD using time-averaged restraints [32,33], are a useful means to avoid overestimating the precision of the final structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When restrained molecular dynamics refinement is performed on a bound ligand in the absence of the receptor, the danger exists that regions of the ligand that are poorly restrained by NOES will adopt conformations that are influenced by the force field of the free ligand. Refinement methods that beter represent the limitations of the NOE restraints, such as MD using time-averaged restraints [32,33], are a useful means to avoid overestimating the precision of the final structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). MD simulations run in the presence of time-averaged restraints [32,33] indicate that the NOE restraints are insufficient to precisely define the orientation of this ring, instead allowing it to pivot through a range of acg!es. Hence, the precise orieztetion of this ring in the final MD-refined NMR structures is apparently dictated partly by the MD force field.…”
Section: Conformation Of Bound Fk506mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SA model of the AMBER program was used to speed up the conformational search. The time-averaged restraint method (63,66,67) was used to include interproton-distance (a total of 40) and dihedral-angle (a total of 16, pertaining to angles for Ala residues, and angles for O residues, and , , and angles for X residues) restraints determined from the ROE intensities and coupling constants, respectively. Because of overlapping of the peaks of the H ␣ and H ␤ protons, it was not possible to determine the dihedral angles and angles alanines and for ornithines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HN-C A H spin-spin accounting of conformationally averaged NMR experimental data. A time-averaged model was used in distance-based refinecoupling constants for Arg9, His10, Ser12 and Cys13 residues are close to the values typical for random coil peptides (Table ment [12,13] or in refinement directly against the NOE crosspeak volumes [15]. An alternative approach treats experimental 1) and do not allow us to restrain the corresponding torsion angles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%