1996
DOI: 10.1021/ed073p461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are They Really Sloppy?: A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in the Laboratory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of this newer TLC technique is the topic of a number of papers (137)(138)(139)(140). These should be consulted to learn the important details of carrying out ion-pair reversed-phase TLC separations.…”
Section: Hydrophobic Modified Phases (Rp Phases)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this newer TLC technique is the topic of a number of papers (137)(138)(139)(140). These should be consulted to learn the important details of carrying out ion-pair reversed-phase TLC separations.…”
Section: Hydrophobic Modified Phases (Rp Phases)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the face of these many pedagogical efforts to raise the level of students' laboratory technique, an article in this Journal questioned whether introductory college chemistry students actually need to improve their manipulative skills (65). A group of freshman biology students were given the task of determining the amount of fluoride in dental tablets by potentiometric titration.…”
Section: Combining Physical Practice With Mental Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, knowledge about comparisons between experimental data, which are increasingly used in analytical laboratories to find out whether there are significant differences between techniques, is useful. This Journal has published several articles dealing with general statistical experiments (2), statistical studies by computer simulation (3), direct comparison of experimental data (4,5), comparison of relative standard deviation values (6), and statistical comparisons using different tests (confidence intervals, contrast of hypothesis, normal distribution, and t, Q, F, χ 2 tests; ref [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%