1997
DOI: 10.2307/2329492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are There Tax Effects in the Relative Pricing of U.S. Government Bonds?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compare the behavior of the model‐implied and empirical real yields using index‐linked bonds. We use the approach suggested by Green and Odegaard (1997) and Buraschi and Jiltsov (2005) to control for the tax implications of the inflation adjustment of the principal amount. We focus this part of the analysis on the sample period after January 29, 1997, which is the date of the first Tips issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the behavior of the model‐implied and empirical real yields using index‐linked bonds. We use the approach suggested by Green and Odegaard (1997) and Buraschi and Jiltsov (2005) to control for the tax implications of the inflation adjustment of the principal amount. We focus this part of the analysis on the sample period after January 29, 1997, which is the date of the first Tips issue.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measure bond liquidity as the length of time that the bond has been outstanding (bond age). Past research has documented that bond prices reflect liquidity premium and more recently issued bonds are more liquid than previously issued bonds (Green and Odegaard, 1997). We also control for firm characteristics in our multivariate regressions.…”
Section: Issue and Firm Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If mutual funds generally avoid below de minimis trades, why do dealers and institutions not actively purchase more market discount bonds? In the Treasury bond market, Green and Ødegaard (1997) show that dealers and large tax‐exempt institutions dominate because they have lower trading costs and can take unlimited interest expenses and loss deductions. Their estimates of implicit tax rates in the Treasury market are zero.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our focus is on the effect of federal income and capital gains taxes on municipal bonds faced by a person purchasing a tax‐exempt bond in the secondary market. We also consider only the effect of taxes on bonds held to maturity, following Litzenberger and Rolfo (1984) and Green and Ødegaard (1997). The Internet Appendix discusses the tax treatment of bonds sold prior to maturity 6…”
Section: Income and Capital Gains Taxes On Municipal Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation