2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are there differences between training curricula on paper and in practice? Views of European trainees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 12% of residents think they were well informed. Tutorship would be a solution.Kuzman et al, 2012a [27]To assess the problems in the implementation of psychiatric training curricula and the quality control mechanisms available in European countriesQuasi-experimental (quantitative) study: Survey (letter to editor)Response rate: 29/ unknown total of countries29- In 13 countries (45%), trainee representatives reported some differences between the psychiatric curriculum on paper and curriculum in practiceRepresentatives from EFPT member countries filled in a country report survey form. They were asked to rate the differences between the psychiatric curriculum on paper and the curriculum in practice in their countries as significant, existing to some extent or not existing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 12% of residents think they were well informed. Tutorship would be a solution.Kuzman et al, 2012a [27]To assess the problems in the implementation of psychiatric training curricula and the quality control mechanisms available in European countriesQuasi-experimental (quantitative) study: Survey (letter to editor)Response rate: 29/ unknown total of countries29- In 13 countries (45%), trainee representatives reported some differences between the psychiatric curriculum on paper and curriculum in practiceRepresentatives from EFPT member countries filled in a country report survey form. They were asked to rate the differences between the psychiatric curriculum on paper and the curriculum in practice in their countries as significant, existing to some extent or not existing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, funding, quality and availability of psychiatry training posts varies considerably worldwide, with only 68% of the world’s countries offering psychiatry training [ 7 , 8 ]. Even if adequate numbers of people are interested in psychiatry, their decisions may be influenced by training job availability and prospects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The World Psychiatric Association (WPA) included recruitment to psychiatry as a major part of its 2008–2011 Action Plan [ 6 ]. There is a wide variation in psychiatric training opportunities worldwide [ 7 - 9 ] which is reflected in numbers of places available. For example with over 24,000 medical graduates each year in the UK, there are fewer than 450 new places for training in psychiatry, thus even if adequate numbers of people are interested, they may not be able to find jobs [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study does not explore the practical consequence of the differences in training programmes or quality control mechanisms for the implementation of the training. However, in a recent publication (Kuzman et al 2012), we indicated problems in the implementation in practice of psychiatric training curricula associated with the absence of quality control mechanisms. A second limitation of the study methodology is that data of countries where multiple officially recognised training programmes exist is only based on responses concerning a majority of accredited training institutions.…”
Section: Quality Assurance Of Psychiatric Training Across Europementioning
confidence: 88%
“…This possibility already exists in the UEMS recommendations (UEMS Section for Psychiatry 1997), but there are relatively few countries where independent audits of training are performed (Strachan 2007). It is noteworthy that in countries where regular audit of training programmes exists, differences between training standards and implementation were reported less frequently regardless of the evaluation strategy (Kuzman et al 2012). As such, more effective strategies for the implementation of the existing quality control mechanisms should be developed on an international level.…”
Section: Quality Assurance Of Psychiatric Training Across Europementioning
confidence: 99%