2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(03)00044-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are there developmentally distinct motor indicators of pain in preterm infants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
91
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 for definitions of each of the indicators). All of these indicators have been validated individually for assessing acute pain in preterm infants (Grunau et al, 2000;Stevens et al, 2000;Morison et al, 2003;Holsti et al, 2004). Moreover, the 5 facial actions we selected have been validated for assessing postoperative pain in infants born preterm and up to 18 months of age (Peters et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 for definitions of each of the indicators). All of these indicators have been validated individually for assessing acute pain in preterm infants (Grunau et al, 2000;Stevens et al, 2000;Morison et al, 2003;Holsti et al, 2004). Moreover, the 5 facial actions we selected have been validated for assessing postoperative pain in infants born preterm and up to 18 months of age (Peters et al, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a subset of NIDCAP movements could be used as valid acute pain cues in preterm infants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Although the second study measured pain responses over longer periods of time and compared the NIDCAP with other reliable infant biobehavioral pain measures, it included only 10 infants, and the time of each handling phase was not controlled. 29 The purpose of the present study was to determine whether a subset of NIDCAP movements could be used as valid acute pain cues in preterm infants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume and color of gastric residuals are often used to reflect feeding intolerance, but the NEC-predictive value of this marker is uncertain [6]. Decreased physical activity is an early sign of adverse body conditions in both children and adults [6,7] and is also a common observation in neonatology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%