2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are There Detrimental Effects From Proficiency-Based Training in Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery Among Novices? An Exploration of Goal Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two mainly aspects of discussion regarding learning clinical skills were performance and students’ psychological process. Some of reports focused on the learning outcome including academic performance, or fair evaluation of clinical skills[ 3 , 20 , 21 , 30 , 31 ]. They discussed the various curricula for learning surgical skills including suturing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two mainly aspects of discussion regarding learning clinical skills were performance and students’ psychological process. Some of reports focused on the learning outcome including academic performance, or fair evaluation of clinical skills[ 3 , 20 , 21 , 30 , 31 ]. They discussed the various curricula for learning surgical skills including suturing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another one study investigated the detrimental effects on learning laparoscopic learning skills, and the study aimed to explore the possibility to avoid the detrimental effects by giving the learning goal for the novice. Unfortunately, no significant difference between groups were observed, and the performances in the both groups were similar to each other[ 31 ]. A prospective trial implemented FC to surgical clerkship, and the differences between pre-test and post-test were found across all curricula.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the process, 12 and 11 manuscripts have been included for, respectively, the qualitative synthesis and the quantitative meta-analysis (Tables 1 and 2; Supplementary Material Appendix 3A, http://links.lww.com/SLA/ C803). A summary of the 26 excluded manuscripts 41,42,[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]43,[61][62][63][64][65][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] is reported in Supplementary Material Appendix 3B, http://links.lww.com/SLA/C803…”
Section: Study Selection Flow-chartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, performance based assessment in the clinical environment evaluating transfer of acquired competencies into job behaviours (Kirkpatrick level 3 evidence) has been proven, but changes in patient outcomes (Kirkpatrick level 4) could not be determined. 30 As the PROSPECT program offers basic endovascular skills training and improves trainees' performance, it should be integrated preferentially into the early phase of the learning process 31 and should become a prerequisite prior to treating real patients. 32,33 According to the Dreyfus model of skills acquisition, there are five phases in the learning process: novice, advanced beginner, competent, proficient, and expert.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%