2018
DOI: 10.3390/jrfm11040066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are There Any Volatility Spill-Over Effects among Cryptocurrencies and Widely Traded Asset Classes?

Abstract: In the present paper, we investigate connectedness within cryptocurrency markets as well as across the Bitcoin index (hereafter, BPI) and widely traded asset classes such as traditional currencies, stock market indices and commodities, such as gold and Brent oil. A spill over index approach with the spectral representation of variance decomposition networks, is employed to measure connectedness. Results show no significant spillover effects between the nascent market of cryptocurrencies and other financial mar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
29
3
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
29
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We can conclude from our result that the interconnectedness between pairs of cryptocurrencies and stock markets is mostly positive suggesting the stock markets as the major spillover effect transmitters to cryptocurrency markets which contradicts the findings of Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2019) and Trabelsi (2018) which shows cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin and Litecoin as the largest net transmitters of spillovers effects. However, the interconnectedness between pairs of cryptocurrencies and commodities is mostly negative indicating the cryptocurrencies as the major spillover effect transmitters to gold and crude oil markets providing evidence in support of the works of Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2019) and Trabelsi (2018). Nevertheless, the spillover effects across markets are weak across frequencies.…”
Section: Pairwise Spillover Frequency Connectednesscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…We can conclude from our result that the interconnectedness between pairs of cryptocurrencies and stock markets is mostly positive suggesting the stock markets as the major spillover effect transmitters to cryptocurrency markets which contradicts the findings of Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2019) and Trabelsi (2018) which shows cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin and Litecoin as the largest net transmitters of spillovers effects. However, the interconnectedness between pairs of cryptocurrencies and commodities is mostly negative indicating the cryptocurrencies as the major spillover effect transmitters to gold and crude oil markets providing evidence in support of the works of Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2019) and Trabelsi (2018). Nevertheless, the spillover effects across markets are weak across frequencies.…”
Section: Pairwise Spillover Frequency Connectednesscontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Their findings show that the inclusion of bitcoin among hedging strategies that comprise gold, oil and emerging stocks reduce portfolio risks considerably compared to the one without them. In contrast, Trabelsi (2018) adopts the generalized forecast error variance decomposition methodology of Diebold and Yilmaz (2012) and Barunik and Krehlik, 2018 to analyze the volatility spillover among cryptocurrencies and widely traded assets. The study finds no significant evidence for spillover between cryptocurrencies and other assets classes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the same method, Mensi et al [28] [29] consider the spillover effects among West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, precious metals (gold and silver), and agricultural staples (rice, wheat, and corn). Trabels [30] uses the Diebold-Yilmaz approach and Barunik and Krehlik methodology to study the connectedness among cryptocurrency markets, the Bitcoin index, traditional currencies, stock markets, gold, and crude oil. Liu et al [31] examine the spillovers of return and volatility from fossil fuel energies (crude oil, coal, natural gas) to electricity spot and three electricity futures in Europe using the same time-frequency domain frameworks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%