2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2018.08.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the short cationic lipopeptides bacterial membrane disruptors? Structure-Activity Relationship and molecular dynamic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous studies, we identified very a promising compound—(C 10 ) 2 -KKKK-NH 2 —which exhibits strong antibacterial activities and low toxicity towards human cells in vitro [35,36]. In this study we have further investigated the antimicrobial activity of this compound with regard to its potential application in ophthalmology, and pre-evaluated its irritation potential via computational methods which have proved to be very useful in predicting and describing the properties of the compound [37,38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, we identified very a promising compound—(C 10 ) 2 -KKKK-NH 2 —which exhibits strong antibacterial activities and low toxicity towards human cells in vitro [35,36]. In this study we have further investigated the antimicrobial activity of this compound with regard to its potential application in ophthalmology, and pre-evaluated its irritation potential via computational methods which have proved to be very useful in predicting and describing the properties of the compound [37,38,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). According to these results and Greber et al (2019), the action of lipopeptides was on the cell membrane of P. putida.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Grau-Campistany et al (2015) provided strong evidence that lipopeptides altered the bacterial membrane permeability barrier. Furthermore, Greber et al (2019) reported that lipopeptides showed a significant effect on cell membrane permeability. The difference in inhibition activity is probably due to the differences in the lipid bilayer composition between gram-positive bacteria and gram-negative bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the analysis regarding selected common species of concern in AI also showed that both lipopeptides clearly reduced the number of relevant Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial species from six (ASP w/o) to only two (C16-KKKK-NH 2 ) or one (C16-KKK-NH 2 ) compared to the controls, which are promising results for their antibacterial activity. Prior studies with similar lipopeptides support these findings, demonstrating that lipopeptides inhibit the growth of both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria 48 and the overall antimicrobial activity appeared to be dependent on the length of the hydrophobic chains and the amount of lysine residues 32 .…”
Section: Bacteria Asp W/o Supplements Asp W/ C16-kkk-nh 2 Asp W/ C16-mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Interestingly, both belonged to the group of lipopeptides with the lowest MIC against tested control bacteria 18 , 31 , suggesting, that the reason for their sperm-compatibility was not an overall lower efficiency or activity, but rather a higher and more specific target selectivity. While there is evidence in prior studies suggesting that the effect of the two selected lipopeptides results from a more complex mode of action than a simple detergent-like membrane disruption, their intricate mechanism is yet to be discovered 32 . Nevertheless, AMPs bear a high potential to be applied as additives in semen preservation, when carefully selected on the basis of their antimicrobial mechanism of action and membrane selectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%