The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the impacts of carbon nanotubes enhanced in Mytilus galloprovincialis submitted to air exposure?

Abstract: Intertidal species are frequently exposed to environmental changes associated with multiple stressors, which they must either avoid or tolerate by developing physiological and biochemical strategies. Some of the natural environmental changes are related with the tidal cycle which forces organisms to tolerate the differences between an aquatic and an aerial environment. Furthermore, in these environments, organisms are also subjected to pollutants from anthropogenic sources. The present study evaluated the impa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Trombini et al, 2016Teixeira et al, 2017) and nanoparticles (e.g. Andrade et al, 2018;Taze et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trombini et al, 2016Teixeira et al, 2017) and nanoparticles (e.g. Andrade et al, 2018;Taze et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…after exposure of organisms to different concentrations of Gd. Due to their sedentary and filtration behavior, as well as their capacity to respond to environmental alterations, M. galloprovincialis mussels are widely used as bioindicators of a vast diversity of pollutants, including classical elements such as metals (among others, (Coppola et al, 2018;Maanan, 2007;Mejdoub et al, 2018;Regoli and Principato, 1995) and compounds considered of emerging concern including pharmaceuticals (Balbi et al, 2018;Maria et al, 2016), and nanoparticles (Andrade et al, 2018;Auguste et al, 2018;Taze et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each biochemical determination, 0.5 g FW soft tissue per organism was used (three individuals per replicate, twelve per condition). Samples extraction was performed with specific buffers for each biomarker in the proportion 1:2 w/v (see for details: Almeida et al, 2014;Andrade et al, 2018;Freitas et al, 2019). Sonication was applied to each sample for 15 s at 4 °C, which was posteriorly centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 g (or 3,000 g for electron transport system activity (ETS)) at 4 °C.…”
Section: Biological Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%