2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.crma.2010.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are the hyperharmonics integral? A partial answer via the small intervals containing primes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the hyperharmonic numbers of order r are never integers except when n = 1 . This conjecture was justified for a class of pairs (n, r) by Ait-Amrane and Belbachir [1,2] and Cereceda [8]. Very recently Göral and Sertbaş [14] extended the current results for large orders; considering primes in short intervals, they proved that almost all hyperharmonic numbers are not integers.…”
Section: Hyperharmonic Numbers: Starting With H (0)mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…the hyperharmonic numbers of order r are never integers except when n = 1 . This conjecture was justified for a class of pairs (n, r) by Ait-Amrane and Belbachir [1,2] and Cereceda [8]. Very recently Göral and Sertbaş [14] extended the current results for large orders; considering primes in short intervals, they proved that almost all hyperharmonic numbers are not integers.…”
Section: Hyperharmonic Numbers: Starting With H (0)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Later this result was improved by Amrane and Belbachir [1,2] (see also Cereceda [8]) to some general class of the parameter r . All these results were further sharpened by Göral and Sertbaş [14].…”
Section: On the Noninteger Propertymentioning
confidence: 97%