Are the current On-site Stormwater Detention (OSD) policies the best solution for source control stormwater management? A case study of Australian and Brazilian cities

Abstract

In recent decades On-site Stormwater Detention (OSD) systems have been implemented in many cities around the world. However, a few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of OSD policies. Therefore, this paper compared the use of OSD in Australian and Brazilian cities, evaluating aspects of regulations, technical details and management matters. The results showed that Australian OSD design guidelines are a few steps ahead of Brazilian manuals. However, it is not possible to affirm that the catchment-based approach, adopted by most Australian councils, is better than the site-based approach, embraced by Brazilian cities, since neither is supported by monitoring data of real OSD performance. In general, all municipalities have the same management problems. There is no control over the number of OSDs built in the cities or even the conditions of the systems. Thus, the authors proposed some directions on how OSD performance could be better evaluated.

Plant growth-promoting microbes improve stormwater retention of a newly-built vertical greenery system

“…Currently, on-site stormwater retention, detention, and infiltration are favored practices in urban flood management worldwide (Carter and Fowler, 2008;Drumond et al, 2020). VGS have the potential to outperform traditional approaches, but there is very little data about their effectiveness and efficiency (Ascione et al, 2020).…”

Policy, Institutions and Regulation in Stormwater Management: A Hybrid Literature Review

“…Decades of implementing rainwater detention systems, with little evaluation of their effectiveness, demonstrate how necessary it is to collect data and information, so that policies regarding these systems can be improved [30].…”

Urban FEW Nexus Model for the Otun River Watershed

“…Some of the most common GI alternatives are bioretention cells, buffer prairie zones, retention/detention ponds, permeable pavements, and bioswales. A limitation for the implementation of GI is associated with the high construction costs and uncertainty about their performance (Drumond et al, 2020;Karnatz et al, 2019;Lintern et al, 2020). Even though there are constraints that have restricted the extensive construction of GI, problems associated with climate change and extreme events can be drivers Besides the benefits of GI for flood management, they can also be considered to address water quality problems.…”