2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are teachers losing control of the classroom? Global changes in school governance and teacher responsibilities, 2000–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is particularly concerning for the United States, where we find a greater level of government responsibility in the area of curriculum and instruction compared to other OECD countries. In previous work that used PISA data to examine changes in responsibilities from 2000 to 2015, we found that the United States had the fourth highest increase of government responsibility overall and the second highest increase (behind Greece) of government responsibility in the area of curriculum and instruction (Jeong & Luschei, 2018). This trend toward government control over classroom-level decisions in the United States-combined with the negative or nonsignificant relationship we find in the current analysis between government responsibility in curriculum and instruction and student achievement-illustrates the potentially harmful influence of increasing government control over classroom-level decisions that occurred during NCLB.…”
Section: Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This result is particularly concerning for the United States, where we find a greater level of government responsibility in the area of curriculum and instruction compared to other OECD countries. In previous work that used PISA data to examine changes in responsibilities from 2000 to 2015, we found that the United States had the fourth highest increase of government responsibility overall and the second highest increase (behind Greece) of government responsibility in the area of curriculum and instruction (Jeong & Luschei, 2018). This trend toward government control over classroom-level decisions in the United States-combined with the negative or nonsignificant relationship we find in the current analysis between government responsibility in curriculum and instruction and student achievement-illustrates the potentially harmful influence of increasing government control over classroom-level decisions that occurred during NCLB.…”
Section: Implications For Policy and Practicementioning
confidence: 82%
“…In a study of 33 countries that participated in PISA in both 2000 and 2015, Jeong and Luschei (2018) found that during this 15-year period, most countries centralized overall and in the separate domains of budgeting, staffing, and curriculum and instruction. The strongest evidence of centralization occurred in the area of curriculum and instruction, with 27 of 33 countries moving toward curricular centralization from 2000 to 2015.…”
Section: Global Trends In Educational Centralization/decentralizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If this factor is ne- glected, teachers will show deficiency behavior, that is, making the least effort and showing apathy to various demands addressed to them even though they have met the academic qualification requirement. The study by Jeong and Luschei (2018) reported that although the teachers' level of education increased, their responsibility decreased. Academic qualification is expected to be the determining factor that determines better teacher performance.…”
Section: Differences Between the Social Competence Of Bachelor Degreementioning
confidence: 99%