2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are suburbs perceived as rural villages? Landscape-related residential preferences in Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we focused on explaining variation in perceived visual landscape quality, landscape satisfaction and place attachment between municipalities. The sprawl and fragmentation associated with urbanisation are typically viewed as negative by residents, particularly in more rural environments (Ströbele and Hunziker 2017). Likewise we would expect a positive effect of the diversity of landscape composition, because landscapes that offer high visual diversity are commonly preferred (Kaplan and Kaplan 1989).…”
Section: Municipality-level Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we focused on explaining variation in perceived visual landscape quality, landscape satisfaction and place attachment between municipalities. The sprawl and fragmentation associated with urbanisation are typically viewed as negative by residents, particularly in more rural environments (Ströbele and Hunziker 2017). Likewise we would expect a positive effect of the diversity of landscape composition, because landscapes that offer high visual diversity are commonly preferred (Kaplan and Kaplan 1989).…”
Section: Municipality-level Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on life experiences, individuals, groups or entire societies fulfil their needs and determine their landscape demands, which arein an ideal case -then communicated via multiple forms of landscape negotiation into planning action or changes in land use. We observe that these landscape negotiations go far beyond functional aspects and are increasingly centered around place meanings, involving societal discourses on lifestyles (Stroebele and Hunziker, 2017). As shown by, e.g., Devine-Wright and Batel (2017), place attachment and meanings play an important role in accepting or rejecting infrastructure projects.…”
Section: What We Know: Space -Place and Landscape Negotiationmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Table 1 highlights some examples of population segments that are highly relevant for studying place attachment in mobile societies. There should be a special focus on how mobile people perceive landscapes, either in terms of self-reflection (experiences and achievements) or social integration (values, norms, symbols and meanings) (Hunziker et al, 2007;Ströbele & Hunziker, 2017). In addition, focus-group studies should gather the visual, sensual and socialpsychological landscape demands of the target groups.…”
Section: Research Challenge: the Formation Of Place Attachment In Mobile Societiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, modern rural landscapes are at risk of abandonment and degradation, and the erosion of rural land by urbanization has led to the use of rural land in modern times, such as Agricultural intensi cation and land abandonment (Strbele and Hunziker 2017;Dolejš et al 2019;Li et al 2021). Urbanization has not only changed the traditional rural low-intensity land use (Banerjee and Srivastava 2013;Lieskovský et al 2015;Pedroli et al 2016) has also revolutionized rural landscape vision, ecological diversity, and biocultural heterogeneity (Hartel et al 2010;Gottero and Cassatella 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%