2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are stocks dumped or neglected by analysts' inferior investments to covered stocks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the obtained results, the authors conclude that the neglected firm effect does not exist on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. On the other hand, the study by Lee et al (2011) gives evidence in favour of the neglected firm effect. The study shows that uncovered stocks make monthly by 0.46%, i.e.…”
Section: Semi-strong-form Market Efficiency Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Based on the obtained results, the authors conclude that the neglected firm effect does not exist on the Istanbul Stock Exchange. On the other hand, the study by Lee et al (2011) gives evidence in favour of the neglected firm effect. The study shows that uncovered stocks make monthly by 0.46%, i.e.…”
Section: Semi-strong-form Market Efficiency Testsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…But contradicting to theory neglected firm monthly abnormal return was found to be -1% which clearly states that there is no neglected firm effect in Istanbul stock exchange. Lee, Sharma and Cai (2010) suggests that the stocks that are not recommended by analysts tend to outperform the stocks that the analysts recommend. The higher returns earned by investors of dumped stocks is recompense for greater search cost and the higher risk linked with these stocks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%