2017
DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2017.1398387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are statutory protections sufficient to protect people living with HIV who are employed in the medical workplace?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This exemption is still, however, a decision for physicians to make based on the patient's adherence to treatment and treatment results (The Public Health Agency of Sweden, 2018). Indeed, earlier research has shown that healthcare providers working in non‐HIV specific medical environments are more likely to enact stigma and uphold HIV‐related stigma than are professionals more familiar with HIV care (Fisher & Henrickson, 2019). Swedish medical records are still being marked with warning labels for people living with HIV and, although this procedure is under evaluation, it is worth noting that this is a distinct act of labelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This exemption is still, however, a decision for physicians to make based on the patient's adherence to treatment and treatment results (The Public Health Agency of Sweden, 2018). Indeed, earlier research has shown that healthcare providers working in non‐HIV specific medical environments are more likely to enact stigma and uphold HIV‐related stigma than are professionals more familiar with HIV care (Fisher & Henrickson, 2019). Swedish medical records are still being marked with warning labels for people living with HIV and, although this procedure is under evaluation, it is worth noting that this is a distinct act of labelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study explored the impact of statutory protections for people living with HIV employed in the medical workplace and found that stigma and discrimination continued to be significant issues after the implementation of this legislation (Fisher & Henrickson, 2019). The conclusion of this research was that legislative measures alone are not enough to cease institutional discrimination, and that these efforts require additional training and mentorship to provide safe and inclusive environments (Fisher & Henrickson, 2019). The findings from that article support what the participants in this research have stressed, which is that it is important to look beyond legislation and to continue to ascertain its weight and wider impact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hill (2009) asserted that by disclosing an employee health status in a non-discrimination available HIV policy organization will lead to organizational exclusion, ridicule, verbal and physical threats, violence, marginalization, or hitting the lavender ceiling (a perceived tendency for organization to not promote or advance. According to Fisher and Henrickson (2019) statutory protections are not sufficient to protect PLHIV employees. Additional emphasis in the form of formal HIV friendly policies by business organizations themselves are crucial to ensure a safe and inclusive working environment.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Career Advancement Among Plhiv and Hypot...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of being diagnosed with a terminal illness, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) that may lead to death is significant and far-reaching because it may influence a lot of aspects in an individual life. People living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV) must integrate the situation of having the virus into their self-concept and career progression while they need to maintain their relationships with others, careers, and well-being (Hunt et al, 2003;Fisher and Henrickson, 2019). Even though it is clearly mentioned in the Code of Practice on Prevention and Management of HIV/AIDS that the HIV virus is not transmitted through (a) casual physical contact, (b) coughing, sneezing and kissing, (c) by sharing toilets and washing facilities, (d) by using eating utensils or consuming food and beverages handled by someone who has HIV, and (e) by insect bites such as mosquitoes and head lice (p. 4), however it has been reported that PLHIV encounter discriminatory treatment, been avoided, and oppressed at workplace (Lee et al, 2002;Eaton et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%