2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are sex differences in antisocial and prosocial Facebook use explained by narcissism and relational self-construal?

Abstract: a b s t r a c tPrevious research has found that some people use Facebook for antisocial purposes, such as for "trolling" or attention-seeking. Conversely, others use Facebook in prosocial, relationship-enhancing ways, such as to increase belonging or to connect with friends. Few studies, however, have investigated differences between men and women in their antisocial and prosocial use of Facebook. The present study sought to address this research gap by examining whether these sex differences might be explaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the trend mentioned above in online donation seems to contradict existing literature on the characteristics of young people and social media users. Specifically, young people and social media use are strongly associated with narcissism[1] (McCain and Campbell, 2018; Harton et al , 2014; Ablow, 2013; Malcolm, 2014), an individual characteristic that is associated with anti-social behaviors such as greed, insincerity and dishonesty (Ferenzi et al , 2017; Carpenter, 2012; Miller and Maples, 2011) Trait personality models of narcissistic personality disorder, grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism. Arguably, this is because social media use feeds narcissism by encouraging self-promoting behaviors in consumers such as updating their status, changing their biographical information and uploading pictures of themselves (Harton et al , 2014; Ablow, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the trend mentioned above in online donation seems to contradict existing literature on the characteristics of young people and social media users. Specifically, young people and social media use are strongly associated with narcissism[1] (McCain and Campbell, 2018; Harton et al , 2014; Ablow, 2013; Malcolm, 2014), an individual characteristic that is associated with anti-social behaviors such as greed, insincerity and dishonesty (Ferenzi et al , 2017; Carpenter, 2012; Miller and Maples, 2011) Trait personality models of narcissistic personality disorder, grandiose narcissism and vulnerable narcissism. Arguably, this is because social media use feeds narcissism by encouraging self-promoting behaviors in consumers such as updating their status, changing their biographical information and uploading pictures of themselves (Harton et al , 2014; Ablow, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we hypothesized that men would evidence stronger associations between Facebook and sex than women (Hypothesis 1a). Further, in line with research on sex differences in prosocial behavior ( Beilin, 2013 ; Ferenczi et al., 2017 ), we hypothesized that, relative to men, women would evidence stronger associations between Facebook and prosocial displays (Hypothesis 1b). Likewise, in line with previous studies ( Mcandrew and Jeong, 2012 ), we predicted that relationship status would modulate Facebook users' implicit associations, by men not currently in a relationship exhibiting stronger implicit associations between Facebook and sex (Hypothesis 1c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is an unexpected result. Although the state of the art on sex differences in online prosocial behavior is mixed ( Chiou et al., 2014 ; Ferenczi et al., 2017 ), previous literature suggested that, relative to women, men are more likely to think in Facebook as a mate-seeking tool ( Mcandrew and Jeong, 2012 ; Muscanell and Guadagno, 2012 ; Mazman and Usluel, 2011 ). One possibility is that the application of a novel, implicit methodology and the nature of the association it was being compared with might explain this divergence from previous studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, people click the "Likes" response to endorse the content shared by friends or receive "Likes" from friends (Kosinski et al, 2015;Wang et al, 2018), which remain appealing to every individual to pour attention to the emotional exchange with their friends and families. Similarly, existing studies have explored the research on the implicit association between Facebook users and PBs, and the Facebook users may be changing their relationship with social networks (Ferenczi et al, 2017;Villacampa et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%