2018
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32174-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are school-based physical activity interventions effective and equitable? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cluster randomised controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 93% proportion of 'The Daily Mile' spent in MVPA is significantly higher than that reported in average primary school physical education sessions (Hollis et al, 2016). However, recent systematic reviews recognise that compensatory reductions in MVPA can occur elsewhere in the school day when school-based physical activity interventions are introduced (Love et al, 2018). 'The Daily Mile' has potential to increase the rate and duration of MVPA children achieve during the school day but further research is required to establish compensatory effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The 93% proportion of 'The Daily Mile' spent in MVPA is significantly higher than that reported in average primary school physical education sessions (Hollis et al, 2016). However, recent systematic reviews recognise that compensatory reductions in MVPA can occur elsewhere in the school day when school-based physical activity interventions are introduced (Love et al, 2018). 'The Daily Mile' has potential to increase the rate and duration of MVPA children achieve during the school day but further research is required to establish compensatory effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When planning targeted interventions, it is important to know where and how the relevant behavior changes in boys and girls. Previous interventions aimed at increasing young people's daily PA have generally had a small effect, 36 and although schools are a natural setting for interventions, because most of the population can be reached there for a major part of the day, the evidence for the efficacy of school‐based interventions for whole‐day PA is weak 37 . This may partially be due to compensation that attenuates the effects of PA increase during school time by a more inactive leisure time 38 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All schools implemented MK with good delity, achieving 75% or above adherence to the programme's implementation strategies. The qualitative data con rms that this may be attributed to the simple nature of the programme and suggests that it is be easier to achieve good delity with simple programmes such as MK, compared to more complex multicomponent programmes which are susceptible to poor delity, particularly in real world contexts (11). There is also the added bene t of such programmes requiring very little or no ongoing investment in infrastructure and resources, making it credible for large scale dissemination and adoption (34).…”
Section: Fidelitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Possible explanations are that intervention components were not effective, and/or they were not implemented appropriately. Consequently, a greater focus on documenting real-world implementation and delity as part of evaluations of public health interventions (10), school-based physical activity interventions (11), and school-based running programmes, (12) is needed. from one context to another, and the factors which may constrain or enhance the implementation process (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%