2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are rural residents willing to trade-off higher noise for lower air pollution? Evidence from revealed preferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The revealed preference method allows the researcher to infer a household's actual preferences and tradeoffs when faced with real-world choices. It is less likely to be subjected to any potential biases of hypothetical behavior (Leon et al ., 2023). Therefore, the policy recommendations based on the empirical evidence and discussion would help deter or encourage the observed behavior of households.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revealed preference method allows the researcher to infer a household's actual preferences and tradeoffs when faced with real-world choices. It is less likely to be subjected to any potential biases of hypothetical behavior (Leon et al ., 2023). Therefore, the policy recommendations based on the empirical evidence and discussion would help deter or encourage the observed behavior of households.…”
Section: Discussion and Policy Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the human level, continuous exposure to noise pollution can have serious health consequences. 9 Among the most common effects are chronic stress, sleep disturbances, cardiovascular and hearing problems, and impaired cognitive performance. In the specific case of children, early exposure to high noise levels can negatively affect language development and learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, environmental noise pollution from stationary agricultural sources such as grain dryers is much less studied than the impacts of workers at facilities or of environmental noise pollution from transportation [8] or in urban areas [9]. One survey-based study suggests rural residents may accept lower levels of ambient environmental noise than urban residents and would be willing to accept increased noise if related air pollution is reduced [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last significant study of grain dryer noise in Ontario, Canada, was conducted by Clarke et al [10] in 1998. Measurements were taken at 14 Ontario farms with dryers in the fall of 1997, and data from 12 of these sites were analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%