2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00037-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are ricefields a good alternative to natural marshes for waterbird communities in the Camargue, southern France?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
76
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As with other man-made wetlands (Tourenq et al 2001;Maeda 2001;Múrias et al 2002;Elphick and Oring 2003;Ma et al 2004;Paracuellos and Telleria 2004;Santoul et al 2004), these ponds were exploited all year long by several waterbird species and provided them with refuge, food and/or breeding sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As with other man-made wetlands (Tourenq et al 2001;Maeda 2001;Múrias et al 2002;Elphick and Oring 2003;Ma et al 2004;Paracuellos and Telleria 2004;Santoul et al 2004), these ponds were exploited all year long by several waterbird species and provided them with refuge, food and/or breeding sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, artificial wetlands hold less abundant populations than natural wetlands (e.g. Tourenq et al 2001;Ma et al 2004), but these man-made wetlands may be important in some situations and for certain species (Froneman et al 2001;Elphick and Oring 2003). For example, irrigation ponds hold larger populations of Blackwinged Stilt, Little Grebe and Common Shelduck than the natural wetlands at the area (Martí and Del Moral 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The climatic conditions, the use of different rice varieties over somewhat different soils, the differences in weed species, the fact that the landscape is more fragmented in the Camargue, and that the waterfowl use the ricefields mainly as nocturnal foraging grounds may all potentially lead to different conclusions. Additionally, previous studies may have underestimated total waterfowl use of ricefields since surveys were made during the day-time (e.g., Tourenq et al 2001 for Europe; Elphick and Oring 2003 for the US). In particular, we aimed at quantifying (1) the trampling effect of ducks on the density of standing stalks and; (2) the foraging effect of ducks on seed abundance and species richness, considering both rice leftovers and weeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%