2012
DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.93639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Q-switched lasers for Nevus of Ota really effective in pigmented skin?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the different lasers available, recurrences have been reported in NOA after complete clearance with laser treatment varying from 0.6% to 1.2% . But our focus is restricted to the issue of nonresponsive or partially responsive cases of nevus of ota . This is usually a common occurrence in pigmented skins .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In spite of the different lasers available, recurrences have been reported in NOA after complete clearance with laser treatment varying from 0.6% to 1.2% . But our focus is restricted to the issue of nonresponsive or partially responsive cases of nevus of ota . This is usually a common occurrence in pigmented skins .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations in depth and density of dermal melanocytes account for differences in lesional color due to the Tyndall effect, in which longer wavelengths of light are absorbed by dermal melanin while shorter wavelengths are reflected. The almost dogmatic use with QS‐1064 nm in pigmented skin, discounting the color and depth of the lesion could account for the variable results . It has been confirmed histologically that the depth of melanocytes within NOA varies according to lesional color and site .…”
Section: Factors That Predict Responsementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In pigmented skin, the results are not as good as in western skin types as the pigment in the epidermis alters the laser physics dynamics. [7] In the study, the difference in the improvement of the peel group (40.44%) and the low fluence laser group (47.93%) was not markedly different though it apparently achieved statistical significance. [1] It would have been informative to know at which sitting did this difference emerge and the statistical comparison between the two groups is not mentioned in the plethora of tables in the text, which probably is an oversight.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Tedavide kozmetik kamuflaj, Q-Switched Nd-YAG laser ile başarılı sonuçlar alınabilir [11,12]. Bizim hastamızı tedavi olarak laser ve kamuflaj konusunda bilgilendirdik.…”
Section: Olgu Sunumuunclassified