2012
DOI: 10.1515/humor-2012-0017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are pun mechanisms universal? A comparative analysis across language families

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to provide a new definition of pun, in order to d escribe it in a cross-linguistic perspective and to point out that puns, as v erbal humorous phenomena which exploit ordinary phonetic processes, are u niversal. The definition is tested through a comparison among puns in 15 languages belonging to different families. I show that puns always imply the manipulation of a string through mechanisms involving all the elements of the phonetic chain. Such manipulation is realized in all pos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Puns are one such case. Unlike temporary ambiguity, punning is a rhetorical device consisting of intentional exploitation of phonetic measures to evoke two meanings (Guidi, 2012). In the example used by Coulson and Severens (2007) "During branding, cowboys have sore calves, " quite intuitively, successful appreciation of the humorous effect of the pun requires one to access both the "cow" and "leg" meanings of the homograph calf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Puns are one such case. Unlike temporary ambiguity, punning is a rhetorical device consisting of intentional exploitation of phonetic measures to evoke two meanings (Guidi, 2012). In the example used by Coulson and Severens (2007) "During branding, cowboys have sore calves, " quite intuitively, successful appreciation of the humorous effect of the pun requires one to access both the "cow" and "leg" meanings of the homograph calf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%