2014
DOI: 10.1111/nph.12756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are polyploids really evolutionary dead‐ends (again)? A critical reappraisal of Mayroseet al. (2011)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
174
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 159 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
4
174
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Polyploidy has both costs and benefits, and under stable environmental conditions, polyploidy is considered to be disadvantageous due to the reduced fitness of polyploid individuals caused by their reproductive isolation and lower fertility (Comai, 2005). The lower speciation/diversification rates and higher extinction rates observed in neopolyploids compared with diploids (Mayrose et al, 2011) could be due to sampling errors and methodological shortcomings (Soltis et al, 2014) or may also be a consequence of the outweighing costs of polyploidy associated genomic and phenotypic instability, as well as the reproductive disadvantages under normal conditions. However, the adaptive advantages of polyploidy caused by enhanced genetic repertoire (resulting from increased heterozygosity, the buffering effect of gene redundancy on mutations, neofunctionalization, differential expression, or epigenetic reprogramming of duplicated genes) and reproductive plasticity (facilitation of reproduction through selffertilization or asexual means) would be expected to confer a competitive advantage to polyploid species under extreme and unstable environmental conditions (Comai, 2005;Fawcett and Van de Peer, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polyploidy has both costs and benefits, and under stable environmental conditions, polyploidy is considered to be disadvantageous due to the reduced fitness of polyploid individuals caused by their reproductive isolation and lower fertility (Comai, 2005). The lower speciation/diversification rates and higher extinction rates observed in neopolyploids compared with diploids (Mayrose et al, 2011) could be due to sampling errors and methodological shortcomings (Soltis et al, 2014) or may also be a consequence of the outweighing costs of polyploidy associated genomic and phenotypic instability, as well as the reproductive disadvantages under normal conditions. However, the adaptive advantages of polyploidy caused by enhanced genetic repertoire (resulting from increased heterozygosity, the buffering effect of gene redundancy on mutations, neofunctionalization, differential expression, or epigenetic reprogramming of duplicated genes) and reproductive plasticity (facilitation of reproduction through selffertilization or asexual means) would be expected to confer a competitive advantage to polyploid species under extreme and unstable environmental conditions (Comai, 2005;Fawcett and Van de Peer, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, WGDs have greatly contributed to plant evolution and speciation (Wood et al, 2009;Jiao et al, 2011). However, to what extent WGD leads to the origin of novel adaptive traits and fosters species radiation remains controversial (Ohno, 1970;Arrigo and Barker, 2012;Soltis et al, 2014). Comprehensive understanding of the molecular and evolutionary processes underlying the preservation and diversification of duplicated genes may thus be central to an integrative consideration of organismal diversity (McGrath and Lynch, 2012;Nei, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expected reduction in genetic diversity has led to some authors to propose that polyploidisation should be an evolutionary dead end (e.g. Stebbins 1950), and recent work suggests that polyploid lineages have lower rates of speciation than diploid lineages (Mayrose et al 2011;Arrigo and Barker 2012; but see Soltis et al 2014a). Yet, the successful establishment of some polyploid lineages indicates that the severity of the challenges associated with the origin of polyploids, including the loss of genetic diversity due to small population sizes at their origin, can sometimes be circumvented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%