2022
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1221292/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are People with Poor Differentiation of Self at Risk of Developing Eating Disorders? A Study of Jewish and Arab Participants

Abstract: Purpose: In light of findings that Israeli Arabs report higher prevalence of eating disorders (EDs) than Israeli Jews and that higher rates of the risk of EDs have been reported by females than males, the first aim of this study was to further investigate the cultural and gender differences in differentiation of self (DoS) and risk of developing EDs among Israeli young adults. The second aim was to examine whether DoS is associated with the risk of EDs. Methods: Of the 859 participants (670 females, mean age 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Well-differentiated individuals tend to exhibit better coping abilities in stressful situations, experience greater well-being, possess a positive self-concept, and align their lives with their own desires ( 50 ). Conversely, poorly differentiated people are more likely to report higher levels of anxiety ( 51 ), stress, and depression ( 2 ), and to be at higher risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus ( 52 ) and eating disorders ( 10 , 53 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Well-differentiated individuals tend to exhibit better coping abilities in stressful situations, experience greater well-being, possess a positive self-concept, and align their lives with their own desires ( 50 ). Conversely, poorly differentiated people are more likely to report higher levels of anxiety ( 51 ), stress, and depression ( 2 ), and to be at higher risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus ( 52 ) and eating disorders ( 10 , 53 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%