The renaissance in organocatalysis that was sparked by the List, Lerner, and Barbas 1 study of the proline-mediated aldol reaction has led to reports of a wide variety of electrophile/ nucleophile reactions catalyzed by a range of primary and secondary amines. 2 In addition to its efficiency in the archetypal aldol reaction, proline has also been shown to be effective in other enantioselective transformations thought to proceed via an enamine mechanism, including Mannich reactions, enamine addition to azo and nitroso groups, and conjugate addition to a number of different Michael acceptors.Additives such as water, acids, and bases have been shown to influence either or both reactivity and enantioselectivity in transformations catalyzed by amine-based catalysts. 3 Our recent studies suggest that the rate of proline enamine formation is enhanced in the presence of protic additives, without affecting product enantioselectivity, in the aminoxylation and -amination of propionaldehyde (Scheme 1). 3g We report here that addition of organic bases in the -amination of aliphatic aldehydes results in an intriguing reversal of product enantioselectivity as well as changes in the kinetic profile. The mechanistic implications of these findings are discussed in the context of contending models for the enantiodifferentiating step in enamine catalysis. Figure 1 compares reaction rate as a function of fraction conversion in the -amination of propionaldehyde with DEAD (Scheme 1) using fully solubilized proline 4 as catalyst both in the absence and presence of catalytic amounts of the organic base DBU. The kinetic profile is altered from the sigmoidal shape characteristic of this reaction to reveal initially positive order kinetics followed by a zero order regime. Strikingly, the presence of DBU induces a reversal of product enantioselectivity from 85% (R) to 46% (S). A similar reversal of enantioselectivity was observed with other tertiary amines, correlating roughly with pK a as shown in Figure 2. Interestingly, phosphazene bases of even higher pK a gave product ee values similar to DBU (P 1 -t Bu, 58% ee; P 2 -t Bu, 56% ee; BEMP, 57% ee). The strongest (and bulkiest) base tested, P 4 -t Bu, gave none of the reaction product 3a. Table 1 shows that this reversal of enantioselectivity holds for a range of aliphatic aldehydes (compare entries 7-12 to 1-6). The reaction product was stable to racemization when [DBU] did not exceed [4], although racemization is observed when DBU is mixed with the product in the absence of proline. 4 Product enantioselectivity in the presence of DBU was highest when the DBU: proline [4] ratio was ca. 0.9:1, while lower DBU concentrations gave the same trend but a less pronounced reversal of enantioselectivity. Addition of bases in enamine catalysis has not been been extensively studied, 3a,3h and to our knowledge an inversion of ee in the presence of base such as we observe here has not been reported previously. 5 The most significant conceptual role proposed for base additives comes from the work ...