Are our president learning? Unpacking the enthymematic connections in the speech mistakes of President George W. Bush

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore public interpretations of President George W. Bush's speaking errors. One interpretation of Bush's speech mistakes offered in the media is that he may have dyslexia. Therefore, we explore how an enthymeme using markers of dyslexia as a sign of bad leadership has been used to frame Bush's speaking errors. We provide an analysis of an exemplar of how Bush's speech errors are represented in the media. Our exemplar is the desktop calendar George W. Bushisms: The Accidental Wit and Wisdom of Our 43rd President. We demonstrate that this text focused on common indicators of dyslexia, that is, speaking errors, to position Bush as a ‘bad’ and ‘stupid’ leader. Finally, we offer conclusions and implications that this study has for our understanding of politics and disabilities.

Consuming Image: How Mass Media Impact the Identity of People with Disabilities

“…Disability studies scholar Barnes (1992) argued that the negative stereotypes within media portrayals of the disability community devalue disabled people, which might even lead them to ''deny their disability status to avoid negative public judgments'' (Quinlan & Bates, 2010, p. 10). For example, some people with learning disabilities are not willing to disclose this information to the public because they are afraid of negative evaluations (Quinlan & Bates, 2010). Therefore, media could affect the identity of people with disabilities.…”

The Anxious Times

“…As cited by Shiels (2012, p. 67), ‘the traditional model portrays people with disability (PWD) as malfunctioning in a medical or economic way, thus constructing them as inferior (Burns, 2011, p. 73)’. By framing persons with disabilities as ‘helpless victims’, such models tend to stigmatize individuals to the detriment of their self-esteem and self-identity, by devaluing their identities, promoting stereotypes and increasing social and self-stigma (Quinlan & Bates, 2010; Zhang & Haller, 2013). Negative media representations of disability need to be openly discussed to enable more socially responsible discourse to be advanced (Zhang & Haller, 2013).…”

Spontaneous Representations of Disability and Attitudes toward Inclusive Educational Practices: a Mixed Approach

“…Most of the time, the media describes disability in terms of heroes that need to be admired or tragic cases that people should feel compassionate or sorry for (Stamou & Padeliadu, 2009;Van Kraayenoord, 2002), using either the medical, the social, or the supercrip models (Clogston, 1990). Research generally emphasizes the media's significant impact on people's representations and attitude toward disability, acknowledging the harmful effects of negative film images on this (already) stigmatized group's psychological state (Davies et al, 2002;Quinlan & Bates, 2010). Data on the diffusion of technology suggested that older people do not significantly differ from younger ones in terms of frequency use of the Internet, as they do in terms of the technology domain (Olson et al, 2011).…”