2004
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are occupational therapists more effective than social workers when assessing frail older people? Results of CAMELOT, a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: There was no clear difference in patient-centred effectiveness measures between occupational therapists and social workers in assessing frail older people and their carers in the community. More extensive use of primary care health services by occupational therapists may have contributed to the differences in EQ-5D scores for carers. Delays in making occupational therapy assessments and in completing recommended housing adaptations may have contributed to these negative findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, for efficient case management there is a need for the OTs to obtain detailed information on the progression of the HA process for each individual. Otherwise, there is a considerable risk that the lack of information might lead to overall quality deficiencies both in the healthcare and social services delivery process within the municipalities (41) and with regard to the specific HA process (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, for efficient case management there is a need for the OTs to obtain detailed information on the progression of the HA process for each individual. Otherwise, there is a considerable risk that the lack of information might lead to overall quality deficiencies both in the healthcare and social services delivery process within the municipalities (41) and with regard to the specific HA process (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the limited occupational therapy research focused specifically on carers, such therapists' interventions are often seen to benefit carers (Joice et al 1990, Logan et al 1997, Harmer and Bakheit 1999, Heywood 2001, Hawkins and Stewart 2002, Hogan et al 2004, Stewart et al 2005, Graff et al 2006. For example, a qualitative study exploring the value and effectiveness of providing housing adaptations, based on 104 semi-structured interviews and 102 questionnaires completed by service users and family carers, concluded that such adaptations benefited both parties (Heywood 2001).…”
Section: Needs Relating To the People Cared Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study's generalisability is potentially reduced by the fact that the service users concerned had all experienced strokes, however. In addition, resource constraints prevent the delivery of frequent occupational therapy services to all local authority service users (Stewart et al 2005).…”
Section: Needs Relating To the People Cared Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Een vierde, in 2006 gevonden RCT van beperkte methodologische kwaliteit vergeleek een ergotherapeutische inventarisatie van problemen en oplossingen met een inventarisatie door een maatschappelijk werker. 22 Er bleek geen verschil in de effecten van deze interventies op het zelfstandig functioneren van de dementerende ouderen (SMD 0,00; 95%-BI -0,24-0,24). Twee RCT's presenteerden resultaten die betrekking hadden op mantelzorgers.…”
Section: Begeleiden Van Mantelzorgersunclassified
“…21 Stewart rapporteerde een toegenomen kwaliteit van leven voor de groep mantelzorgers die ergotherapie ontvangen had (SMD 0,73; 95%-BI 0,25-1,21). 22 Door de beperkte methodologische kwaliteit van de betreffende onderzoeken dienen de resultaten voorzichtig geïnterpreteerd te worden.…”
Section: Begeleiden Van Mantelzorgersunclassified