2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-4403(03)00081-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are obsidian subsources meaningful units of analysis?: temporal and spatial patterning of subsources in the Coso Volcanic Field, southeastern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experience with western North America obsidian sources, the rate of hydration in the SNR is on par with Coso obsidian, which hydrates faster than most other obsidians in the region (e.g. Eerkens and Rosenthal, 2004;Fredrickson et al, 2006;Hughes, 1988;King, 2004). This rapid rate of hydration is good for dating purposes because it gives greater resolution to differentiate relative ages for a given degree of precision (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our experience with western North America obsidian sources, the rate of hydration in the SNR is on par with Coso obsidian, which hydrates faster than most other obsidians in the region (e.g. Eerkens and Rosenthal, 2004;Fredrickson et al, 2006;Hughes, 1988;King, 2004). This rapid rate of hydration is good for dating purposes because it gives greater resolution to differentiate relative ages for a given degree of precision (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, we believe that in many cases even this large error will prove useful to archaeological investigations in the SNR. This is particularly true for preceramic sites, where there is little else to date (for recent analogs in North America see Eerkens and Rosenthal, 2004;Eerkens et al, 2007), and surface sites where there is no charcoal or diagnostic ceramics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some obsidian provenience studies have been able to reliably recognize ''subsources'' of obsidian and have shown that these sources provide useful information related to human land-use practices (Eerkens and Rosenthal 2004;Young 2002). Classic geochemical compositional analysis such as X-ray fluorescence, instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA), particle-induced X-ray emission analysis (PIXIE), and others have been successful for obsidian source studies, not only because obsidian flows are easily recognized and then tested for a signature, but also because the relatively fast solidification of molten rock creates a diagnostic array of minerals that results in diagnostic elemental signatures.…”
Section: Raw Materials and Organizational Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although extensive sampling was conducted to determine the locations of primary and secondary sources of rock this study, like many raw material provenance projects, is largely probabilistic (Eerkens and Rosenthal, 2004;Shackley, 1998). Therefore, we can never say with absolute certainty the exact locations of raw material sources because of the multitude of problems associated with assigning an artifact to a specific primary source (i.e.…”
Section: Raw Materials Sourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%