Are ‘New Wars’ More Atrocious? Battle Severity, Civilians Killed and Forced Migration Before and After the End of the Cold War

Abstract

It is widely believed that the human impact of civil conflict in the present era is especially destructive.Proponents of the 'new wars' thesis hold that today's conflicts are fuelled by exclusive identities, motivated by greed in the absence of strong states, and unchecked by the disinterested great powers, resulting in increased battle severity, civilian death and displacement. The ratio of civilian to military casualties is claimed to have tilted, so that the overwhelming majority of those killed today are civilians. Using systematic data that are comparable across cases and over time we find that, contrary to the 'new wars' thesis, the human impact of civil conflict is considerably lower in the post-Cold War period. We argue this pattern reflects the decline of ideological conflict, the restraining influence of globalization on governments, and the increasing rarity of superpower campaigns of destabilization and counterinsurgency through proxy warfare.Word Count: 11 986

Massacres and Morality: Mass Killing in an Age of Civilian Immunity

“…After a number of false starts, international efforts gradually improved, testified by the steady reduction of both the number of new cases of mass killing and the average lethality of those cases, and the concomitant increase in the number of international missions dispatched to protect civilians. 92 In short, continuing the trends evident towards the end of the Cold War, the 1990s seemed to suggest that civilian immunity had triumphed over the anti-civilian ideologies and that at least two important intervening variables were now working in its favor: the dissemination of information made it easier to detect mass killing and the end of global strategic rivalry reduced the number and seriousness of countervailing policy concerns that had formerly reduced the degree to which civilian immunity was prioritized.…”

Violent Societies

“…These arguments on the changing nature of warfare have led to a significant debate in the study of violent conflict as scholars took issue with these ideas (Booth, 2001;Kalyvas, 2001;Malešević, 2008;Melander et al, 2009;Mello, 2010;Mundy, 2011;Newman, 2004;Shaw, 2000). Much of the criticism of new wars theory disagree with claims about the novelty of contemporary wars and argue that 'new' wars, in fact, share many of the characteristics of 'old' wars (Berdal, 2003;Booth, 2001;Henderson and Singer, 2002, p. 165;Kalyvas, 2001;Newman, 2004;Reyna, 2009, p. 294).…”

The Coming Stability? The Decline of Warfare in Africa and Implications for International Security

“…Post-Cold War conflicts may even be less deadly for civilians than earlier conflicts. 52 The most important specific controversy is the fighting in the DRC from 1996 to the present. The scale of war deaths is so large that the numbers can drive the entire African trend.…”