2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are New Gender-Neutral Pronouns Difficult to Process in Reading? The Case of Hen in SWEDISH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In some antecedent types, the pronoun they was read with greater facility than the other pronouns, whereas in other antecedent types, it was read with equal facility as the other pronouns (i.e., gender-matching pronouns). These results are in line with the findings reported by previous studies ( Foertsch and Gernsbacher, 1997 ; Sanford and Filik, 2007 ; Vergoossen et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In some antecedent types, the pronoun they was read with greater facility than the other pronouns, whereas in other antecedent types, it was read with equal facility as the other pronouns (i.e., gender-matching pronouns). These results are in line with the findings reported by previous studies ( Foertsch and Gernsbacher, 1997 ; Sanford and Filik, 2007 ; Vergoossen et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This imbalance is important because it indicates that resistance to hen is mainly based on emotional or affective grounds, and less on ‘rational’ or objective grounds, such as actual problems in processing the content of a sentence. This aligns with results from eye‐tracking (Vergoossen et al., 2020b), where hen did not have a relevant processing cost in reading. Still, hen seems to evoke negativity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Results from Study 2, where participants rated sentences with pronouns in the specific and generic meaning, indicated that resistance towards hen mainly was affectional – negative valence was higher for sentences with hen compared to sentences with binary pronouns, but especially for sentences with the specific meaning of hen. Yet, grammaticality and especially reading difficulty revealed that hen is both perceived as grammatically correct and not that hard to read, which aligns with eye‐tracking studies showing that hen had a negligible processing cost (Vergoossen et al., 2020b). Grammaticality and reading difficulty tap into the cognitive aspects of attitudes, while negative valence is related to affect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Gender pronouns resolve some (but not all) of these ambiguities. Indeed, people read sentences more slowly when they refers to an individual than a group (Sanford & Filik, 2007; but see Vergoossen et al, 2020). However, this difficulty may simply be due to the relative unfamiliarity of singular they as a personal pronoun.…”
Section: Language and Social Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%