1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(99)00066-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are neurons multifractals?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Is a DLA a multifractal? [26,[28][29][30] . These publications and their authors are well known in the fi eld of physics and thus their results are widely cited.…”
Section: How Can Fractal Analysis Be Better Understood?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Is a DLA a multifractal? [26,[28][29][30] . These publications and their authors are well known in the fi eld of physics and thus their results are widely cited.…”
Section: How Can Fractal Analysis Be Better Understood?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable estimates for the mass fractal dimension can be obtained using this approach based on about 10% of the aggregate particles as centres 2 . As an aside we note that the application of this formalism to neuronal morphology in reference 8 incorrectly uses the exponent q on the left hand side of Eq. (2) rather than the exponent (q − 1).…”
Section: Mi(l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative mass method has been used extensively in the fractal analysis of clusters grown using computer growth models such as diffusion-limited aggregation 1,2,3,4 , in which the growing aggregates are composed of identical sized particles. The cumulative mass method has also been employed in the fractal analysis of neuronal morphology 5,6,7,8 . In these studies, neuronal morphology has been represented as digitized camera lucida images which can again be regarded as aggregates comprising identical sized particles (pixels).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our results, an anomalous behaviour is observed: the D q curves increase at the beginning. This anomalous behaviour has also been observed in Opheusden et al (1996), Smith andLange (1998), andFernández et al (1999). Some reasons for this behaviour have been suggested, including that the boxes contain few elements (Fernández et al, 1999), or the small scaling regime covers less than a decade so that we cannot extrapolate the box counting results for the partition function to zero box size (Opheusden et al, 1996).…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 67%