2018
DOI: 10.1177/1352458518791518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are neurofilaments valuable biomarkers for long-term disease prognostication in MS?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies highlighted the relevance of sNfL levels to reflect ongoing neuroinflammation as well as neurodegeneration in patients with MS. 8,37 In our cohort, only patients with highly active relapsing-remitting MS disease course were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies highlighted the relevance of sNfL levels to reflect ongoing neuroinflammation as well as neurodegeneration in patients with MS. 8,37 In our cohort, only patients with highly active relapsing-remitting MS disease course were included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the determination of serum NFL concentration, which does not necessarily require a lumbar puncture but can be now measured in the blood, seems to correlate with many clinical and magnetic tomographic characteristics of MS [96, 104, 105]. A future establishment as a prognostic biomarker in clinical practice is therefore conceivable.…”
Section: Molecular Biomarkers For Ms Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated sNfL levels have been shown to reflect acute axonal damage during active inflammation,9 and increasing evidence support the use of sNfL to monitor short-term disease activity, treatment response and disability progression 10. Whether sNfL levels also predict disease progression and neurodegeneration over several years, and even decades, is less clear 6 10–12. Associations between sNfL and long-term disability progression are not consistent,13 14 and although some studies have found higher sNfL levels to be associated with brain13 15 16 and GM atrophy,17–19 studies with extensive follow-up time are few, especially studies considering GM atrophy 17 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%