2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.09.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are nest boxes a viable alternative source of cavities for hollow-dependent animals? Long-term monitoring of nest box occupancy, pest use and attrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
112
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nest boxes are widely used to enhance populations of cavity-nesting species including waterfowl (Savard 1988, Newton 1994, Pöysä and Pöysä 2002, Savard and Robert 2007, passerines (Nilsson 2008), sea birds (Bolton et al 2004), and marsupials (Lindenmayer et al 2009). The effectiveness of nest boxes is determined by a variety of factors including design (García-Navas et al 2008), adjacency to key resources (Aitken and Martin 2004), predation (Brightsmith 2005), nest defense behavior (Rosvall 2008), reproductive output of targeted species (Mátics et al 2008), and the extent that territoriality limits density (Duckworth 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nest boxes are widely used to enhance populations of cavity-nesting species including waterfowl (Savard 1988, Newton 1994, Pöysä and Pöysä 2002, Savard and Robert 2007, passerines (Nilsson 2008), sea birds (Bolton et al 2004), and marsupials (Lindenmayer et al 2009). The effectiveness of nest boxes is determined by a variety of factors including design (García-Navas et al 2008), adjacency to key resources (Aitken and Martin 2004), predation (Brightsmith 2005), nest defense behavior (Rosvall 2008), reproductive output of targeted species (Mátics et al 2008), and the extent that territoriality limits density (Duckworth 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementing secondary and logged forest sites with nest boxes might help make these forests more suitable for some threatened cavity-using species. But nest boxes can be costly to maintain [71,76], are not always effective conservation tools [77], and early occupancy can be followed by attrition that diminishes any long-term benefits [71]. Additional experimentation and monitoring of nest boxes are recommended.…”
Section: Implications For Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silvicultural methods such as shelterwood cutting or clear cutting may benefit wildlife species (e.g., yellow-pine chipmunk (Neotamias amoenus)), by releasing understory vegetation and favoring regeneration of early successional species (Herbers and Klenner, 2007). However, for tree squirrels such as northern flying (Glaucomys sabrinus Shaw), red (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus Erxleben), and gray (Sciurus carolinensis) squirrels, trees support their dreys (Trudeau et al, 2011) and are required for nesting cavities (Fokidis and Risch, 2005;Merrick et al, 2007;Lindenmayer et al, 2009). In scenarios where clearcutting has occurred, or there is a reduction in preferred nesting trees, tree squirrels and cavitydependent birds have declined in abundance (McComb and *Address correspondence to this author at the State University of New York at Plattsburgh, 101 Broad Street, Plattsburg, New York, USA; Noble, 1981;Taulman et al, 1998;Ramos-Lara and Cervantes, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habitat management has often been employed to enhance thinned forests by adding nest boxes to accommodate displaced species. Lindenmayer et al (2009) reported a significant increase in the abundance of cavitydependent species (e.g., bird and squirrel species) by installing nest boxes in previously logged forests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation