2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-013-9668-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Mosses Required to Accurately Predict Upland Black Spruce Forest Soil Carbon in National-Scale Forest C Accounting Models?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, white spruce and black spruce had a strong positive correlation with ORGSOIL in the plot data, but not in the model data. The high ORGSOIL C stocks may be explained by slow decomposition rates associated with the litter and woody debris contributions to organic soil horizons for black and white spruce (Laiho and Prescott, 2004;Lang et al, 2009), and by the fact that they are also commonly associated with mosses in the boreal forest of Canada, especially when they occur on less well or poorly drained sites (Bona et al, 2013). It is likely that accurate modeling in these, and some other boreal forests with significant moss associations, will require representation of moss contributions to ORGSOIL that are currently not included in the CBM-CFS3 (Bona et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, white spruce and black spruce had a strong positive correlation with ORGSOIL in the plot data, but not in the model data. The high ORGSOIL C stocks may be explained by slow decomposition rates associated with the litter and woody debris contributions to organic soil horizons for black and white spruce (Laiho and Prescott, 2004;Lang et al, 2009), and by the fact that they are also commonly associated with mosses in the boreal forest of Canada, especially when they occur on less well or poorly drained sites (Bona et al, 2013). It is likely that accurate modeling in these, and some other boreal forests with significant moss associations, will require representation of moss contributions to ORGSOIL that are currently not included in the CBM-CFS3 (Bona et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Climate and pH also are important drivers of the substrate use efficiency of soil microbes (Cotrufo, Wallenstein, Boot, Denef, & Paul, ), but their relative contributions remain unknown. Several studies have reported that the dominance of the ground layer vegetation also influences C accumulation processes (Bisbee et al., ; Bona, Fyles, Shaw, & Kurz, ). Feathermosses have a higher decomposability (Fenton, Bergeron, & Paré, ; Lang et al., ) and lesser productivity (Bisbee et al., ) than sphagna, so we expected more C accumulation in the FH layer with the increasing dominance of sphagna.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon models serve as the basis for some national C accounting frameworks (Kurz et al 2009). Recently, Bona et al (2013) determined that forest C stocks could not be simulated accurately without information on both vascular and nonvascular biomass and productivity. Although such efforts in boreal regions have focused on forests, attempts to examine landscape to regional carbon exchange and storage will need to consider peatlands, given that these ecosystems are a dominant land cover type in most northern settings.…”
Section: Conclusion and Relevance To Land Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%