2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are men who have sex with men at higher risk for HIV in Latin America more aware of PrEP?

Abstract: Introduction PrEP awareness in Latin America has been poorly characterized, with studies in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru highlighting awareness of 65% among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM). We assessed the association between higher risk of HIV infection, indicative of PrEP eligibility, and PrEP awareness among MSM from these countries. Methods This was a secondary analysis of a web-based survey advertised on social media platforms from March-June 2018 in Brazil, Mexico and Peru. Eligible… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The logistic regression odds ratio reported no significant differences between age groups on the level of knowledge of PrEP. The findings contradict the study in Latin America by Assaf et al (2021), which reported an association between age and PrEP awareness (Assaf et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The logistic regression odds ratio reported no significant differences between age groups on the level of knowledge of PrEP. The findings contradict the study in Latin America by Assaf et al (2021), which reported an association between age and PrEP awareness (Assaf et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The logistic regression odds ratio reported no significant differences between age groups on the level of knowledge of PrEP. The findings contradict the study in Latin America by Assaf et al (2021) , which reported an association between age and PrEP awareness ( Assaf et al, 2021 ). Logistic regression odds ratio reported that Black MSM was knowledgeable as compared to other ethnic groups; these findings contradict the study findings of Kahle et al (2018) , which reported that knowledge levels were higher among White MSM than among other minority races ( Kahle et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“… 38 , 39 Several previous studies exploring PrEP and HIV care in Brazil have found similar racial disparities as observed in the present study. 10 , 23 , 24 , 40 The PrEP Brasil study found Black YMSM had lower levels of protective concentrations of PrEP compared to White and Pardo YMSM, 10 and cross-sectional data have shown a greater awareness of and willingness to use PrEP among White compared to non-White MSM in Brazil. 23 , 24 , 40 Further research to understand the impact of intersectional stigma experienced by Black and Pardo MSM 41 is necessary to increase PrEP use in these populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than half of the YMSM in this study had a high actual risk, while only a quarter had a high self-perceived risk of HIV infection. A recent secondary analysis conducted in 2018 in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru found similar results: 53.3% of MSM had a high risk of contracting HIV based on their HIRI score, but only 24.7% perceived themselves to be at moderate risk [ 23 ]. The self-perceived risk of HIV tends to be lower than the HIRI score [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A recent secondary analysis conducted in 2018 in Brazil, Mexico, and Peru found similar results: 53.3% of MSM had a high risk of contracting HIV based on their HIRI score, but only 24.7% perceived themselves to be at moderate risk [ 23 ]. The self-perceived risk of HIV tends to be lower than the HIRI score [ 23 , 24 ]. Most of the MSM who met ≥10 cutoff criteria of the HIRI score did not perceive themselves to be at a moderate to high HIV risk, but higher HIRI scores were associated with higher self-perceived HIV risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%