Are MD–PhD Programs Meeting Their Goals? An Analysis of Career Choices Made by Graduates of 24 MD–PhD Programs

Abstract

Purpose MD–PhD training programs provide an integrated approach for training physician–scientists. The goal of this study was to characterize the career path taken by MD–PhD program alumni during the past 40 years and identify trends that affect their success. Method In 2007–early 2008, 24 programs enrolling 43% of current trainees and representing half of the National Institutes of Health-funded MD–PhD training programs submitted anonymous data on 5,969 current and former trainees. Results The average program enrolled 90 trainees, required 8.0 years to complete, and had an attrition rate of 10%. Nearly all (95%) of those who graduated entered residencies. Most (81%) were employed in academia, research institutes, or industry; 16% were in private practice. Of those in academia, 82% were doing research and at least 61% had identifiable research funding. Whereas two-thirds devoted more than 50% effort to research, only 39% devoted more than 75% effort. Many with laboratory-based PhDs reported doing clinical, as well as basic and translational, research. Emerging trends include decreasing numbers of graduates who forego residencies or hold primary appointments in nonclinical departments, increasing time to graduation, and expanding residency choices that include disciplines historically associated with clinical practice rather than research. Conclusions Most MD–PhD program graduates follow career paths generally consistent with their training as physician–scientists. However, the range of their professional options is broad. Further thought should be given to designing their training to anticipate their career choices and maximize their likelihood of success as investigators.

Advancing Pharmacist Scholarship and Research Within Academic Pharmacy

“…A study of MD-PhD programs found that 81% of graduates were employed in academia and 61% had obtained research funding. 7 These data provide evidence that such dual-degree programs in medicine are largely successful in training clinician-scientists who devote themselves to an academic research career. Importantly, established biomedical sciences represented the majority of focus for the PhD portion of the combined programs.…”

Un « MD-PhD program » au sein de l’Université de Lyon

“…Une étude rétrospective récente, publiée dans la revue de l'association américaine des écoles de méde-cine (American association of medical colleges -AAMC), s'est intéressée aux MD-PhD programs afin de savoir si ces filières atteignaient leurs objectifs [1] .…”

The Increasing Importance of Translational Vision Research in Refractive Surgery

“…Fortunately, MD-PhD programs have expanded greatly in size in past decades. 5 These programs produce clinicians and surgeons who are extensively trained in cellular and molecular biology techniques. Through the promotion of these educational programs, the clinical scientist has a broader research outlook including the possibilities and sophisticated techniques that only a laboratory offers.…”