2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are low-molecular-weight heparins safe and effective in children? A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Safety concerns, specifically the presumed bleeding risk, are the main reason for paediatric and adult gastroenterologists to be cautious about prescribing prophylactic anticoagulation 68,69 . A systematic review assessing safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in children, showed that major bleeding events occurred in only 0.6% of children (some in neonates) 70 . Studies in children are lacking, but in adults with IBD thromboprophylaxis with LMWH has shown to be safe, even in patients who initially present with rectal bleeding 71,72 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Safety concerns, specifically the presumed bleeding risk, are the main reason for paediatric and adult gastroenterologists to be cautious about prescribing prophylactic anticoagulation 68,69 . A systematic review assessing safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in children, showed that major bleeding events occurred in only 0.6% of children (some in neonates) 70 . Studies in children are lacking, but in adults with IBD thromboprophylaxis with LMWH has shown to be safe, even in patients who initially present with rectal bleeding 71,72 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of LMWH include predictable pharmacokinetics and minimal monitoring. A recent systematic review revealed LMWH appeared to be safe and effective for therapeutic and prophylactic treatment of venous thromboembolism in children [35]. However, it is not optimal for children because of the need for subcutaneous injections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 68 , 69 A systematic review assessing the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in children showed that major bleeding events occurred in only 0.6% of children [some in neonates]. 70 Studies in children are lacking, but in adults with IBD thromboprophylaxis with LMWH has been shown to be safe, even in patients who initially present with rectal bleeding. 71 , 72 In future, direct oral anticoagulants may replace the use of LMWH as thromboprophylaxis in children with a VTE, because of the advantage of oral over subcutaneous administration and fewer bleeding complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%