2008
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2008.69.4.28994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are logbooks of training in anaesthesia a valuable exercise?

Abstract: A logbook of cases experienced and procedures performed is currently required for training in anaesthesia in the UK (Nixon, 2000). But is this process valuable and what are the potential benefits and disadvantages?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…93 In conclusion, procedural lists are most useful for assessing opportunities provided by training posts and to guide programme directors rather than to assess individuals. 8…”
Section: Procedures Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…93 In conclusion, procedural lists are most useful for assessing opportunities provided by training posts and to guide programme directors rather than to assess individuals. 8…”
Section: Procedures Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, doctors are not good at assessing their own performance [100]. They tend to overestimate their own ability, and this tendency is often strongest in those individuals with the lowest competence [101]. Some training programmes require trainees to record their experience in log books, but self-reported log books are unreliable and their validity as a tool for assessing competence has not been well established [102].…”
Section: Assessment Of Airway Competencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is best-suited to detailing the learning cases encountered. 3 It does not normally include a record of success or failure and is unable to identify unsafe or poor practice. The WBAs, designed to document proficiency in specific skills, are also prone to weakness.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%