2002
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/75.4.347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are irregular stands more windfirm?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
74
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many authors expect greater stability of unevenaged systems due to overstorey trees becoming acclimated to the wind (Cameron, 2002;Mason, 2002). Selection forests would be more wind resistant mainly due to higher individual tree stability resulting from better shape (lever arm and bole taper) and better acclimation to wind (Dhôte, 2005).…”
Section: Regeneration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many authors expect greater stability of unevenaged systems due to overstorey trees becoming acclimated to the wind (Cameron, 2002;Mason, 2002). Selection forests would be more wind resistant mainly due to higher individual tree stability resulting from better shape (lever arm and bole taper) and better acclimation to wind (Dhôte, 2005).…”
Section: Regeneration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial recommendation was that CCF was best confined to sheltered sites on deep rooting soils where thinning at regular intervals could be used to gradually open up stands and provide a favourable regeneration environment [9]. A review of evidence about the stability of irregular stands [66] suggested that this recommendation might be pessimistic, since it overlooked the likelihood that dominant trees in irregular stands would be better adapted to withstand the forces of the wind, evidenced in more favourable (lower) height: diameter ratios, greater root mass, and stronger buttressing. Some preliminary modelling using the wind risk model ForestGALES [67] supported this suggestion, indicating that irregular structures could be more stable than regularly thinned even-aged stands on sites of intermediate wind exposure and that heavy early thinning might be used to develop stable dominants as part of the transformation process [66,68].…”
Section: Wind Stability Of Irregular Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of evidence about the stability of irregular stands [66] suggested that this recommendation might be pessimistic, since it overlooked the likelihood that dominant trees in irregular stands would be better adapted to withstand the forces of the wind, evidenced in more favourable (lower) height: diameter ratios, greater root mass, and stronger buttressing. Some preliminary modelling using the wind risk model ForestGALES [67] supported this suggestion, indicating that irregular structures could be more stable than regularly thinned even-aged stands on sites of intermediate wind exposure and that heavy early thinning might be used to develop stable dominants as part of the transformation process [66,68]. A wind tunnel examination of the effect of different stand structures (even-aged, shelterwood, selection) upon the incidence of damaging gusts found similar wind and turbulence characteristics over the different types.…”
Section: Wind Stability Of Irregular Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if site conditions are assumed to be such that endemic windthrow is minimal, the threat of catastrophic windthrow remains [2]. However, it appears that there is little difference in windthrow risk between regular and irregular Sitka spruce stands on relatively sheltered sites [48]. Guidance on the selection of sites suitable for continuous cover forestry is generally to avoid areas of high wind risk [6].…”
Section: Risk and Stochastic Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%