2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2015.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are intangibles more productive in ICT-intensive industries? Evidence from EU countries

Abstract: Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Corrado et al (2005) and Corrado and Hulten (2010) add intangible capital in a Solow-Jorgenson-Griliches sources of growth framework and show that intangibles had overtaken tangibles to become the largest source of growth; further, they find that the full recognition of intangibles, due to the adjustments in real output figures, could induce a change in U.S. measured productivity of approximately 0.25 percentage points per year in recent years. Similar evidence has been provided, for example, by Barnes and McClure (2009) for Australia, Baldwin et al (2012) for Canada, and Corrado et al (2012), Niebel et al (2013), Chen et al (2014) for the European Union. 19…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Corrado et al (2005) and Corrado and Hulten (2010) add intangible capital in a Solow-Jorgenson-Griliches sources of growth framework and show that intangibles had overtaken tangibles to become the largest source of growth; further, they find that the full recognition of intangibles, due to the adjustments in real output figures, could induce a change in U.S. measured productivity of approximately 0.25 percentage points per year in recent years. Similar evidence has been provided, for example, by Barnes and McClure (2009) for Australia, Baldwin et al (2012) for Canada, and Corrado et al (2012), Niebel et al (2013), Chen et al (2014) for the European Union. 19…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The latter two are part of the more broader concept of knowledge-based capital. Based on analyses with country-and industry-level data, Chen, Niebel, and Saam (2016) and Corrado, Haskel, and Jona-Lasinio (2017) conclude that ICT capital and intangible capital (including R&D, organizational capital and firm-specific human capital) are complements in production.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Chen et al . () investigates the extent to which the effect of intangibles varies with the ICT intensity of the industries, thus looking at a source of complementarities. They find that the output elasticity of intangible assets varies between 2 percent for the industries at the lowest quartile of ICT intensities and 15 percent at the highest quartile.…”
Section: Growth Accountingmentioning
confidence: 99%