2021
DOI: 10.1111/nep.13842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are individual analyses of multiple short urine collections throughout the 24 hours superior to a standard 24‐hour urine collection in precipitation risk assessment of healthy subjects?

Abstract: Purpose The commonly used 24‐hour collection technique has been the mainstay of diagnosis for supersaturation but has some certain limitations. Hence, superiority of multiple short urine collections as a new alternative in precipitation risk assessment was assessed compared to the standard 24‐hour urine collection among healthy subjects. Materials and Methods Individual urine samples of 26 healthy subjects were acquired every 2 to 3 hours throughout the 24 hours. Urine samples were obtained and the time and vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The retention time of 24-hour urine specimens is long and the process is complex [6][7][8]. This is the main reason why specimens are prone to get an error testing result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retention time of 24-hour urine specimens is long and the process is complex [6][7][8]. This is the main reason why specimens are prone to get an error testing result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%