2017
DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2016-0029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are Immigrants in Favour of Immigration? Evidence from England and Wales

Abstract: Abstract:Using the UK Citizenship Survey for the years 2007-2010, this paper investigates how immigrants view immigration and how these views compare to the views of natives. Immigrants who have been in the UK longer are similar to natives in being opposed to further immigration, while recent immigrants are more in favour of further immigration. Labour market concerns do not play a large role for either immigrants or natives. However, there is some evidence that financial and economic shocks can increase anti-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within this range, Turkish and other non-Western immigrants are the closest to the native preferences, while the more Westernoriented immigrant groups are placed in the center. Overall, the observational measures bolster previous work on the native-immigrant differences in preferred levels of immigration (Braakmann et al, 2017;Just and Anderson, 2014)-immigrants are indeed more supportive toward higher levels of immigration than their native counterparts, although this difference is not very large. Table A2 in the Supplementary Information presents the nativity gap across the 7-point scale of admission scores.…”
Section: Descriptive Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within this range, Turkish and other non-Western immigrants are the closest to the native preferences, while the more Westernoriented immigrant groups are placed in the center. Overall, the observational measures bolster previous work on the native-immigrant differences in preferred levels of immigration (Braakmann et al, 2017;Just and Anderson, 2014)-immigrants are indeed more supportive toward higher levels of immigration than their native counterparts, although this difference is not very large. Table A2 in the Supplementary Information presents the nativity gap across the 7-point scale of admission scores.…”
Section: Descriptive Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…These former immigrants, however, have an equal vote in designing the immigration policy of tomorrow. 6 Prior work that focused on immigrants’ attitudes was either focused on other political issues, such as redistribution and social spending (Dancygier and Saunders, 2006), or unable to elucidate causal mechanisms of opposition to immigration due to use of observational research designs (Braakmann et al, 2017; Just and Anderson, 2014). This study addressed this limitation by utilizing an experimental design, ultimately allowing for the identification of determinants of opposition to immigration within these growing segments of Western society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, we confirm the linearity of the interaction between reciprocity and unemployment (Hainmueller et al, 2019). Fourth, we test the impact of a set of additional country-level control variables to ascertain the role of institutional reciprocity in our findings, including overall welfare generosity (e.g., Hanson et al, 2007), the immigrant share of the population (e.g., Braakmann et al, 2017), and employment protection legislation (e.g., Ruhs, 2017). We add these controls both at the country-level and interact them with individual unemployment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…However, it is also possible that party polarization on immigration control divides and polarizes immigrants, pushing them in different directions as they align with parties in their host country. Existing research shows that while foreign-born residents are on average more pro-immigration than their native-born counterparts, there is considerable heterogeneity in immigrant attitudes toward immigration (Branton 2007;Jiménez 2007;Rouse, Wilkinson, and Garand 2010;Knoll 2012;Just and Anderson 2015;Braakmann, Waqas, and Wildman 2017). If this heterogeneity is large and newcomers choose parties closer to their views, the impact of party polarization on identification with pro-immigration parties may be weak or even insignificant.…”
Section: Polarization and Party Choice Among Immigrant Partisansmentioning
confidence: 99%