2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.08.582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are ICER Threshold Values Malleable? The Case of Life-Extending Cancer Treatments at the End of Life

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Incremental costs coupled with QALY gains yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus canagliflozin 300 mg of CAD16,392 (IHE-DCM) and CAD18,098 (ECHO-T2DM) per QALY gained from a healthcare payer perspective, and CAD14,127 (IHE-DCM) and CAD13,188 (ECHO-T2DM) per QALY gained from a broader societal perspective (Table 2 ). Each of these estimated ICERs falls below the commonly used Canadian willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD50,000 per QALY gained [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incremental costs coupled with QALY gains yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus canagliflozin 300 mg of CAD16,392 (IHE-DCM) and CAD18,098 (ECHO-T2DM) per QALY gained from a healthcare payer perspective, and CAD14,127 (IHE-DCM) and CAD13,188 (ECHO-T2DM) per QALY gained from a broader societal perspective (Table 2 ). Each of these estimated ICERs falls below the commonly used Canadian willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD50,000 per QALY gained [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%