2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Are homeschooled adolescents less likely to use alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs?

Abstract: Background Nearly two million school-aged children in US are currently homeschooled. This study seeks to examine homeschooled adolescents’ attitudes toward, access to, and use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs (ATOD) compared to their non-homeschooled peers. Methods The study uses data between 2002 and 2013 from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) for school-attending respondents aged 12–17 (n = 200,824). Participants were questioned regarding peer use of licit and illicit substances, ease … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there are some important subgroups of the U.S. youth population missing from the MTF data collected each year, such as students who were home-schooled, have dropped out of school, or were absent on the day of data collection and did not participate in the study. Home-schooled youth are less likely to engage in substance use behaviors [38], while those who drop out or often absent from school are more likely to engage in substance use and other risk behaviors [12,18]. Third, all measures were based on self-reports, and while prior work has found that these self-report measures in the MTF study have been found to be reliable and valid, studies on youth suggest that misclassification and under-reporting of sensitive behaviors such as substance use can occur [2,20,39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there are some important subgroups of the U.S. youth population missing from the MTF data collected each year, such as students who were home-schooled, have dropped out of school, or were absent on the day of data collection and did not participate in the study. Home-schooled youth are less likely to engage in substance use behaviors [38], while those who drop out or often absent from school are more likely to engage in substance use and other risk behaviors [12,18]. Third, all measures were based on self-reports, and while prior work has found that these self-report measures in the MTF study have been found to be reliable and valid, studies on youth suggest that misclassification and under-reporting of sensitive behaviors such as substance use can occur [2,20,39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, there are some important subgroups of the U.S. youth population missing from the MTF data collected each year, such as students who were home-schooled, have dropped out of school, or were absent on the day of data collection and therefore did not participate in the study. High school students who drop out or who are often absent from school are more likely to engage in substance use and other problem behaviors (Miech et al, 2016; SAMHSA, 2014) while home-schooled youth were less likely to engage in substance use behaviors (Vaughn et al, 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, some important subgroups do not participate in the MTF study including adolescents who are home-schooled, dropped out of school, and are absent on the day of data collection. 2,30 Secondary school students who are home-schooled are less likely to engage in substance use behaviors while those who drop out or who are often absent from school are more likely to engage in substance use and other problem behaviors. 2,30 Second, the MTF study did not assess some variables that have been shown to be associated with early onset of substance use behaviors (eg, family psychiatric history).…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%